Tuesday, 25 October 2011 12:26

Getting the price right on both sides of the table

Lawyers address their concerns over current battle on prices

Negotiations over price remain the key area of tension between in-house lawyers and their external counsel, participants at a recent workshop heard.

The training session, hosted in Madrid by IE Law School, was attended by over 50 Heads of Legal as well as law firm Managing Partners from across Barcelona, Lisbon and Madrid.

The current requirement on in-house lawyers to get “more from less” is placing a new emphasis on the cost management and effective delivery of legal services, participants heard. Increasingly, services need to be provided within specific timeframes and at pre-agreed costs, posing new challenges for planning, project management and service delivery.

Inevitably, the downward pressure on costs is also requiring new and creative approaches to the pricing. Traditional approaches to the lawyer-client relationship, where a law firm quite naturally wants to increase client expenditure, result in, at best, what are inefficient and unsatisfactory relationships and, at worst, a systemic tension.

At the session, Carlos de la Pedraja, IE Law School’s Head of Executive Education, launched the 2012 intake of the Lawyers’ Management Programme (LMP) – their flagship leadership programme held annually in Madrid and London.

In addition to experts from IE Law and Business Schools, the global faculty includes lecturers from Georgetown and Harvard Law Schools in the US as well as the University of Oxford in England. Participants also gain new insight from Managing Partners of some of the world’s most successful business and law firms, as well as the Global Heads of Legal at organisations such as Nokia and Vodafone.

The launch session was led by Kevin Doolan, Head of Client Relations with Eversheds in London, a world recognised pricing expert and member of the LMP faculty.   

Participants followed an LMP case study whereby an in-house lawyer asks their preferred law firm for an immediate 15 percent across-the-board discount on their fees, a scenario based on a real situation. In the scenario, the law firm has only a few hours to agree the reduction or lose a major client. 

“Such an approach, where the in-house lawyer asks for a simple percentage reduction in fees is in nobody’s best interest,” he says. “A very different, and more sophisticated, conversation is required.”

In fact, Doolan’s own research suggests that an across the board reduction of the hourly fee, does not necessarily translate into a saving for the client.

“In-house lawyers who demanded a discount at the start of the financial crisis, have told me since that their annual external legal fees in fact remain the same – law firms just expand the amount of time they spend on work. Often through placing more junior, and less expensive, lawyers on the work.”

Eversheds often agree to manage a greater volume of a client’s legal work, receiving a percentage of the save in legal expenditure. At the root of the issue are the inherent tensions in the traditional lawyer-client relationship: the client will seek to reduce, and the law firm increase, the amount of work on each project. The use of the billable hour has served to inflate these tensions, he says.

His own firm has experimented successfully with alternative billing models, for which he received the prestigious Financial Times Innovative Lawyers Award in 2010.

“In-house lawyers benefit from having a better understanding of when and in what circumstances they should complete legal work internally or pass it to an external law firm. Once they decide to source work externally, there needs to be more detailed conversations about where the client feels external lawyers can add value.”
Participants heard, however, that this is easier said than done – clients require certainty as to the process and costs of every engagement while lawyers do not typically have the project management skills this requires. For Kevin, this necessitates agreeing a plan and budget in advance and speaking with the client should further issues arise.

Launched as a response to the economic downturn, the LMP provides participants with the tools they need to better understand the current threats and opportunities to their own business – against a backdrop of the ongoing changes in the delivery of legal services. Lawyers have already attended from Latin America, the US, UK, Europe and Asia.

It has been designed for those who currently are, or have the potential to, manage and lead groups of lawyers. The job titles and specific responsibilities vary across different jurisdictions, although many are Managing Partners, Practice or Office Managers, Heads of Legal or Company Secretaries.

Skills sessions address the parallel leadership challenges, understanding the values and motivation of lawyers during such difficult times. Participants explore their own leadership style as well as those they lead. 

The next LMP intake is in February 2012, with the selection process starting this November.

For further information: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it..

The Latin American Lawyer
N.22 • November 2021

IL98 cover SP IL94 cover EN
 

Iberian Lawyer
N.109 • November 2021

IL98 cover SP IL94 cover EN

IBLLabourAwardsPortugal 202112 300x250 Finalists

UIAMadrid 300x100

IL LatamAwards STD 300x100 1

UIAMadrid 300x100

IL LatamAwards STD 300x100 1

IL LatamAwards STD 300x100 1

IpTmtAwardsSpain 2021 300x100 finalists 1

IL LatamAwards STD 300x100 1

IPTMTAwardsPT 2021 300x250 Vincitori

This website uses cookies

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on the IberianLawyer website. However, you can change your cookie settings at any time. Learn more

I agree

What do I need to know about cookies?

A cookie is a small text file that’s stored on your computer or mobile device when you visit a website. We use them to:

  • Remember your preferences
  • Tailor our sites to your interests.

There are different types of cookies

First party cookies

These are set by the website you’re visiting. And only that website can read them.  In addition, a website might use a separate company to analyse how people are using their site. And this separate company will set their own cookie to do this.

Third party cookies

These are set by someone other than the owner of the website you’re visiting. 

Some IberianLawyer web pages may also contain content from other sites like Vimeo or Flickr, which may set their own cookies. Also, if you Share a link to a IberianLawyer page, the service you share it on (e.g. Facebook) may set a cookie on your browser.

The IberianLawyer has no control over third party cookies.

Advertising cookies

Some websites use advertising networks to show you specially targeted adverts when you visit. These networks may also be able to track your browsing across different sites.

IberianLawyer site do use advertising cookies but they won’t track your browsing outside the IberianLawyer.

Session cookies

These are stored while you’re browsing. They get deleted from your device when you close your browser e.g. Internet Explorer or Safari.

Persistent cookies

These are saved on your computer. So they don’t get deleted when you close your browser.

We use persistent cookies when we need to know who you are for more than one browsing session. For example, we use them to remember your preferences for the next time you visit.

Other tracking technologies

Some sites use things like web beacons, clear GIFs, page tags and web bugs to understand how people are using them and target advertising at people.

They usually take the form of a small, transparent image, which is embedded in a web page or email. They work with cookies and capture data like your IP address, when you viewed the page or email, what device you were using and where you were.

How does the Iberian Lawyer use cookies?

We use different types of cookies for different things, such as:

  • Analysing how you use the IberianLawyer
  • Giving you a better, more personalised experience
  • Recognising when you’ve signed in

Strictly Necessary cookies

These cookies let you use all the different parts of Iberian Lawyer. Without them services that you have asked for cannot be provided.

Some examples of how we use these cookies are:

  • Signing into the IberianLawyer
  • Remembering previous actions such as text entered into a registration form when navigating back to a page in the same session
  • Remembering security settings which restrict access to certain content.

Performance cookies

These help us understand how people are using the IberianLawyer online, so we can make it better. And they let us try out different ideas.
We sometimes get other companies to analyse how people are using the IberianLawyer online. These companies may set their own performance cookies You can opt out of these cookies here.Some examples of how we use these cookies are:

  • To collect information about which web pages visitors go to most often so we can improve the online experience
  • Error management to make sure that the website is working properly
  • Testing designs to help improve the look and feel of the website.
Cookie nameWhat it's for
Google DoubleClick The IberianLawyer uses Google DoubleClick to measure the effectiveness of its online marketing campaigns.Opt-out of DoubleClick cookies
Google Analytics From time to time some IberianLawyer online services, including mobile apps, use Google Analytics. This is a web analytics service provided by Google, Inc. Google Analytics sets a cookie in order to evaluate use of those services and compile a report for us.Opt-out of Google Analytics cookies