Recent events on Wall Street and the subsequent impact on the
global finance sector may mean more than the loss of a few big
clients for the “magic circle” firms internationally, say some. It may
mean re-evaluating their entire international business models.
The collapse of the US investment
banking system, including the filing for
bankruptcy protection by Lehman
Brothers as well as the hasty merger of
Merrill Lynch with Bank of America and the
bailout of the world’s largest insurer AIG, have
left the Iberian markets and law firms in a state
of shock. The Spanish and Portuguese
Governments have sought to inject confidence,
and liquidity, into the domestic financial
systems and to distance their financial
institutions from the resulting market tsunami
but financiers and law firm partners alike have
been anxious to ascertain what impact the
drama may have on their businesses.
The international strategies of the London
“magic circle” and other City-based law firms
have to a large extent been underpinned, and
underwritten, by the global investment banks. What now for them and their international
operations, including those in Iberia? And what
may be the likely repercussions on Iberia’s
domestic law firms, which at first glance would
appear to be largely immune to the events in
Wall Street?
Immediate impact
The collapse of the US-led investment banking
system, and the resulting chaos in the
international capital markets, will, some
suggest, have had a significant impact on the
banking and finance, M&A and tax
departments of a number of the leading law
firms in Spain, especially the international ones.
“You only have to look at the legal
directories to see that Lehman alone spread its
mandates for legal work quite widely,” a senior
Madrid source told Iberian Lawyer. “We had a
lot of files open for them and are only now
coming to realise that we are in a long line of
people with unpaid bills.”
Previous law firm advisers to Lehman in
Iberia include Allen & Overy, Ashurst, Clifford
Chance, Linklaters, Lovells and Uría
Menéndez. Linklaters is also known to have
previously acted for Merrill Lynch, while
Clifford Chance, DLA Piper and Freshfields
have all represented Bank of America locally.
Law firm managing
partners are inevitably
therefore trying to
ascertain where they
stand as creditors and
whether work in progress
for Lehman will transfer
to another investment
bank, and therefore
possibly to another legal
adviser. Some law firms have, off the record,
told Iberian Lawyer that the events unfolding
over recent weeks may leave them facing a
substantial financial hit.
Some calculations suggest that, globally,
several of the magic circle firms were billing
each of their closest investment banking clients
over £40m annually and only slightly less from
other investment banks. If true, these firms may
be seeing a hole emerging in their accounts of
anywhere between £100m-£150m – equivalent
to almost 10% of annual turnover.
Short-term fix
In the short-term however, many of the
London-based international firms seem to be
coping with events with a number even picking
up significant mandates as a direct result of the
collapse of their previous clients.
Los eventos
recientemente acaecidos
en Wall Street y el
subsiguiente impacto en
el sector bancario y
financiero pueden
significar que el magic
circle (círculo mágico)
internacional tenga que
reconsiderar sus
estrategias mundiales,
afirman algunos. Los
bancos de inversiones
que han sido
responsables de grandes
operaciones llevadas por
estos despachos están
actualmente debilitados
y, por lo tanto, las
firmas deberán poner
mayor énfasis en el
desarrollo de una red de
cliente nacional más
fuerte. Esto puede
resultar en un
incremento de la
competitividad para las
operaciones medias,
mayor presión en los
honorarios, y menos
certeza para incluso las
grandes empresas
nacionales.
Ashurst is advising Lehman Brothers on its
European bankruptcy (alongside Weil Gotshal
Manges in the US), while Linklaters’ London
office has been retained by
PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) to coordinate
the European administration proceedings –
with a reported 20-partner, 60-associate, team
now engaged. Linklaters’ Brussels office is also
representing Fortis, following its near collapse
and the sale of its Belgian, Luxembourg and
international operations to BNP Paribas
(including those acquired last year in its joint
€71bn takeover of ABN Amro). Allen & Overy
is representing the Netherlands Government
and Clifford Chance its Central Bank. Clifford
Chance is also advising Barclays Bank on its
acquisition of Lehman Brothers’ US brokerdealer
operations (following an abandoned
earlier analysis to acquire the entire bank).
Davis Polk & Wardwell, which has a small
Madrid office, was retained by a consortium of
ten banks – comprising Bank of America,
Barclays, Citibank, Credit Suisse, Deutsche
Bank, Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan, Merrill
Lynch, Morgan Stanley and UBS – which have
jointly raised a $70bn credit facility to help
ensure liquidity among themselves.
Other firms hope that the change of
ownership at Merrill Lynch will mean business
as usual across Iberia. “As for Bank of America's
acquisition I see little change. To date it has had
only a minimal presence here so there is every
reason to believe that Merrill Lynch’s existing
roster of firms will continue to be used. At least I
hope so,” says one Madrid-based lawyer.
Deeper
The medium-term prospects may however be less
certain, and a number of the magic circle firms are
already known to be reassessing the relative
emphasis of their international operations,
including within Iberia.
Plateau partners’ earnings at magic circle firms
last year were in the range of £1.2m (€1.5m) to
over £2m (€2.5m) but the loss of the investment
banking revenue alone could hit Profit Per Equity
Partner (PEP) heavily. One expert told Iberian
Lawyer that a 10% reduction in income without a
subsequent reduction in costs, would reduce the
profit pool and mean as much as a 25% reduction
in PEP. In addition, firms are seeing increased
pressure on their own loan and debt arrangements
and cash flow may yet become an issue, suggest
some. Deals are taking longer to conclude, clients
are delaying settling their bills but lawyers
salaries´ still have to go out each month.
“The City firms stopped making financial
provisions for the bad times a number of years ago
and instead put the emphasis on increasing
partner earnings. Our costs though are fixed and it
now looks like any loss will have to come out of
the partners’ pool,” says one London source.
Some believe that, among the strategic options
being considered, one is for firms to place build a
stronger domestic client base, which means
greater emphasis on clients outside Madrid. “There is no doubt that we now have
to get out
into the regions,” says one managing partner of a
UK firm in Madrid. “We need to demonstrate to
clients across the peninsula that we can assist them
in their international expansion, to facilitate
acquisitions and to open up new markets for
them.”
Important also, suggest some, is that the UK
firms may no longer be able to rely on the
international banks to get them into the major
domestic deals, and that they will instead have to
start to choose sides in key business sectors.
Such developments will inevitably bring them
into closer competition with the dominant
domestic law firms. Nonetheless, some may be in
a better starting position than others, say some.
Picking up work from regional Spanish clients
is more easily said than done, confided one magic
circle partner: “What can we offer over the strong
domestic firms who have an unbeatable position
outside Madrid? Persuading clients to leave their
current advisors is not an easy proposition.”
Clifford Chance is regarded as already having a
strong domestic profile, and is closer to Uría
Menéndez in shape than Linklaters’ high deal
value and underwriter-focused practice.
Conversely however, Linkaters’ compact 70-
lawyer size arguably means that it requires less
work than Clifford Chance’s 160-lawyer deal-hungry
office.
Also compact in size is Freshfields, which has
had significant local and international success
advising Ferrovial, Abertis and Agbar (through its
Barcelona office) and is acting for Gas Natural in
its €17bn acquisition of Unión Fenosa. Allen &
Overy, which some suggest is the most low-profile
of the magic circle firms in Spain, is nonetheless
also active on headline deals including acting for
Iberia in the takeover by British Airways, and is
advising Alliance & Leicester, the UK bank being
acquired by Banco Santander.
Yet some say that if the magic circle firms go
deeper into the local mid-market, pressure will
inevitably be put on the other London-based law
firm players, as well as the new US arrivals such
as Latham & Watkins.
“The magic circle will always do well. They
have strong international brands, are well known
locally, and will likely benefit from any ‘flight to
quality’. If I was a lawyer at another English firm
like Simmons & Simmons, Ashurst or DLA Piper,
then I might be more worried,” one Madrid
lawyer commented.
These mid-tier firms inevitably counter such
suggestions and highlight their already established
efforts to build strong domestic practices and
profiles. Simmons & Simmons’ 2007 integration
with respected litigation and insolvency firm
Mochales & Palacios arguably gave it a strong
local client base and lead over other firms’ countercyclical
practice development.
The start of the downturn has also seen Ashurst
very busy on refinancing and especially advising
on distressed debt. “Call it good timing or luck,
but we have been promoting our distressed debt
practice for 18 months already, and in the last few
weeks have been approached by a number of
domestic banks to advise them on potential
opportunities,” adds Gonzalo Jiménez-Blanco,
Managing Partner at Ashurst in Madrid.
Domestic situation
Within the leading domestic firms there is also a
strong belief that they will be able to counter any
increased threat posed by the magic circle firms as
they look to deepen their domestic client
portfolios. “UK firms have been here for 25 years
already and we’re clearly still in business,” says
one Madrid firm partner.
A number of Spanish firms emphasise the
strength of their national networks. Madrid may
be Spain’s most profitable legal centre but clients
across the regions are now requiring heavyweight
legal advice and making an ever-greater impact on
billing levels.
“When the economy is not doing so well it puts
extra importance on our regional practices where
it clearly helps that our lawyers reflect their clients:
in Valencia they are Valencian and in Barcelona
they are Catalan. It helps demonstrate that we are
committed to the local economies and are there for
the long-term,” says Juan Agoya, a corporate
partner at Cuatrecasas in Madrid.
The perception among some in the capital is
that many of Spain’s regional firms may indeed
now be doing very well. “Firms like Broseta in
Valencia must be doing the work of their lives. They are so deeply connected
that
there is no way
we can win clients away from them,” says a
partner at one magic circle firm.
Yet the same size and scale that enables firms to
reach across Iberia may nonetheless present
problems if the economy takes a dramatic
downturn, suggest others. Garrigues, with 1,500
lawyers has too many mouths to feed, says one
partner at a rival firm.
Greater emphasis will have to be placed on
partners to go and find work, suggest some. But
under-performance is an issue that many domestic
firms have failed to tackle in recent years and which
may now come back to haunt them.
“Financial reporting is black and white and we
know who has billed what but we are still avoiding
doing anything about it. In the bad years it makes
the issue even more difficult, more personal and
more political,” says the managing partner of one
firm in Madrid.
It is no surprise that greater competition may also
bring increased fee pressure, especially on more
commoditised issues, but many lawyers remain
confident. In-house lawyers tell of external lawyers
refusing to reduce fees, but instead offering to help
legal departments to prioritise better their
workloads.
Those firms that do lower their fees may regret
doing so in the long-term, believe some. “We are not
going to play the fees game. The market will return
in a year or two and we don’t want to be in the
position of having to try to recover our position,”
says the managing partner of one Madrid-based
City firm.
Even so, a prolonged downturn may take its toll. And some say that it will
be felt particularly among smaller corporate-led firms that have capitalised
on
the boom in M&A and private equity deals in recent
years.
One managing partner added: “There is some
ability in Spain to keep M&A lawyers busy with
corporate aspects of restructuring and litigation, but
the magic ingredient is a good finance and tax
practice which some firms lack. Those without it
may find that if matters don’t improve over the next
year then remaining independent may prove
increasingly difficult.”
Reinvention
The scale of the issues potentially facing law firms
means however that some will inevitably have to
reassess their size and market focus. The likely
outcome for some of the London firms currently in
Madrid, some suggest, could be smaller less
specialist offices.
That said, many at the London firms emphasise
that, unlike within their City headquarters, there has
never been the drive towards super-specialism in
Madrid, and so there are unlikely to be large scale
redundancies even in the hardest hit practice areas.
Some do though accept that they may have to
change their ratios, albeit at the top end. “An issue
for us is our number of partners. It is much more
cost-effective for us to have the same number of
associates as we currently have to revisit the number
of partners,” says one Madrid managing partner.
A change of style is already evident among some
of Spain’s largest firms. Cuatrecasas recently
concluded a management board reshuffle and
change of focus that saw the departure of some of its
senior figureheads, leading to a stronger presence by
the firm’s Madrid-based partners.
In any event, short-term fixes may prove to be
irrelevant, suggests Steve Blundell, consultant at
London-based Gracechurch. “Law firms need to be
adaptive but as they have no retained earnings they
are less inclined to take risks. This leads them to
look at their financial engineering – for example,
partner remuneration – whereas other businesses
would simply adapt working patterns and tasks
until the work levels returned.”
One clear advantage for the UK firms is still
their
global networks with which they can clearly
demonstrate their ability to assist Iberian clients to
expand internationally. In addition, it also offers
increased mobility for their lawyers and the ability
to re-orientate themselves towards new or
expanding markets, say some.
In September, Allen & Overy announced the
launch of an office in São Paulo, its first in Latin
America, and where both Clifford Chance and
Linklaters have also expanded recently. A large
number of City law firms – and a growing number
of US firms – are also expanding across the Middle
East and Asia, in their pursuit of sovereign wealth
fund clients.
“Our model dictates that we have to continue to
follow the money. We have to continue to
demonstrate our expertise and to assist clients invest
wherever that, and they, may be,” says a Madrid
managing partner at a magic circle firm.
In any event, say some, law firms will be busy
over the coming months restructuring many of the
M&A deals that their corporate departments have
spent the last few years creating.
“A legacy of the complex, highly-leveraged deals
that so occupied us over the last few years is that
they will demand equally specialist finance,
corporate and tax advice to keep them from
collapsing,” says one Madrid partner.
Likewise, say some, the severity of companies’
legal issues means that there is even greater
emphasis on “quality” legal expertise. “Cost is
currently not an issue. Clients want gold or even
platinum-plated advice and are not going to argue
over an additional €30,000.”
Eventually the markets will inevitably return,
says one Madrid partner. The strongest, most
balanced and best-managed firms will continue to
do well and come out at the other end even stronger.
“Despite the news we are seeing from London
and New York it is not in our character to get too
stressed about what may or may not happen. We are
tempted to say ‘no pasa nada’, stick our heads in the
sand and, for the moment, simply return to the still
significant profit levels we had in 2005.”
Clients are in any event already now looking for
their lawyers to act more as business advisers,
suggest some. They want deals to be done,
restructurings to be concluded as well as receive
help in spotting new or emerging opportunities. The
firms that can provide these kinds of service, they
suggest, will be those that most quickly work
themselves out of the downturn. |